Apple 15-inch MacBook Pro first look review

  • Price When Reviewed: 1130 . 1300 . 1699

Best prices today

Retailer Price Delivery  

Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide

Hard drive options abound

Other than the RAM, about the only thing that can be replaced now is the hard drive. It's user accessible only after removing 10 very tiny screws on the underside of the chassis and lifting off the bottom. That's a little more work than on previous models, where the battery and hard drive could be reached by unlatching part of the bottom case. The screws aren't tightened so much that removing them is as difficult as it has been on some earlier models. (I removed the bottom to photograph what's inside.)

As noted earlier, Apple offers a variety of hard drives across the MacBook Pro line, including my favourite option: an SSD. I've talked up SSDs ever since I got one in a second-generation MacBook Air last year, and I continue to be bullish on them. I even stuck a third-party OCZ 128GB SSD in my MacBook -- two, if you count the first one that failed. You're definitely paying more per gigabyte than with a traditional drive, but if you can afford it, the tradeoff in overall ruggedness, system response and power use -- SSDs have no moving parts and generally need less power -- is worth it.

A 256GB SSD, for instance, adds either £450 or £555 to the bottom line, depending on which specific model you're buying. The 128GB SSD is a more reasonable £140 if you're buying one of the pricier MacBook Pros, £245 if you want it in one of the less expensive ones. In return for spending more on the latest in storage technology, you get less room for data. For that reason alone, most buyers will opt for the tried-and-true hard drives with spinning platters.

The 500GB, 5,400rpm hard drive that came in this particular model surprised me. It's quiet, obviously roomy -- half a terabyte on the go gives you plenty of room to grow -- and was fast enough that I was convinced it was a 7,200rpm model. I had to check the System Profiler to make sure. The same drive costs $50 more if you want the extra zip of 7,200rpm -- or $50 less if you're willing to settle for that same speed in a smaller 320GB hard drive. Hint: Pay the $50 and get the faster 500GB drive if you want to squeeze out the most speed at the least cost.

As usual when I'm working with a new laptop, I ran the Xbench benchmarking test on this one. For comparison's sake, I ran Xbench on the last-generation MacBook -- now MacBook Pro -- with a 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo chip and the OCZ Apex, a 128GB SSD drive. That machine posted an Xbench score of 141; this one, with a notably faster 2.8GHz processor and traditional hard drive, turned in a score of 155. Someday I'm hoping to snag a MacBook Pro with the optional 3.06GHz processor and an SSD and see how that combo performs.

For most people, the 260MHz difference between the stock 2.8GHz chip and the optional 3.06GHz processor isn't worth much more than bragging rights -- not that I'm against bragging rights. Both processors are Intel Core 2 Duos with 6MB of shared Level 2 cache memory, and both are up to any data crunching, video manipulation or digital photo work you have in mind. If you're eyeing the faster processor, I'd -- no surprise -- get the optional 128GB SSD. You'll discern the speed boost more. If you want more detail on how the six MacBook Pros stack up, Macworld has done a good job of putting them through their paces.

Updated LED screens

The new MacBook Pros all have updated LED screens, offering a 60 per cent wider color gamut. That means they're more vivid, according to Apple. Usually, claims of brighter, more richer-looking screens depend on the eye of the beholder, but in this case, I saw a discernible difference between this generation and the last. You need to put the two side by side to really appreciate the change.

Videographers and photographers who use their Macs will no doubt appreciate the new screens, as will movie buffs who watch DVDs on their laptops. It's too bad a Blu-ray optical drive isn't part of the package (Apple doesn't offer one even as an option). The result would be stunning -- especially on the 1920-by-1200-pixel 17-inch model.

Note: We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site, at no extra cost to you. This doesn't affect our editorial independence. Learn more.

Read Next...