• Price When Reviewed: 70 . 17

  • Pros: Fast and efficient; non-modal search/find makes us grin manically; ability to edit in results windows.

  • Cons: Can be complex to set up and tweak; text-completion is and sluggish; .UI feels dated; no Windows version.

  • Expert Rating: We rate this 7 out of 10We rate this 7 out of 10We rate this 7 out of 10We rate this 7 out of 10We rate this 7 out of 10 We rate this 7 out of 10

Best prices today

Retailer Price Delivery  

Price comparison from , and manufacturers

Let’s take a quick trip back to 1991. Photoshop was still on Version 1 and Windows 3.0 had only recently been belched out. In Mac-land, System 6 ruled the roost, and TeachText (SimpleText’s forerunner) was the editor of choice. Rumour has it that BBEdit evolved as a bare-bones editor to usurp TeachText and deal with Apple’s application’s inability to process files larger than 32KB.

Fast-forward 17 years and BBEdit can hardly be classified as ‘bare-bones’ anymore. The feature-packed editor includes support for a huge array of programming languages, has absurdly long menus, and preferences that make your head swim.

However, in the area where it matters most – working with text – it’s still something of a champion. Eschewing page layout and text formatting, it’s carved a niche in the realms of tech-heavy Web design.

This new update isn’t as radical as those added for BBEdit 8, which ushered in major changes to the application’s interface, among other things. Instead, refinements and evolution are the order of the day. Several changes are likely to make seasoned BBEdit users exclaim, “about bloody time”, not least non-modal search and find windows.

You’re finally no longer forced into Copy/Find/Paste/Don’t Find/Copy/Find/Paste madness to set up multiple Find & Replace pairings. Now, the dialog happily works alongside your documents, meaning you’re never locked out – you can even run a bunch of searches and/or replacements simultaneously.

It’s this thinking that’s kept BBEdit relevant, rather than trying to distract users with gloss and arbitrary interface changes (take note, Adobe), and the workflow smoothing continues into results windows.

Now, rather than continually opening, editing and closing documents from results windows, you can edit and save directly within them. Again, this is a minor change, conceptually at least, but in terms of workflow, it’s almost magical and a huge timesaver.