Inspiration for digital creatives

NEW! Topic Zones

Digital Arts cover

Buy latest issue NOW!

NEW ADVENTURES IN DIGITAL PAINTING
REMIX YOUR ART
VINTAGE HALFTONES
COMIC ILLUSTRATION
SURREAL PORTRAITS
WATERCOLOUR VIDEO EFFECTS

PLUS - £300 OF STOCK IMAGES

EDIGIT SIGN-UP

The twice-weekly newsletter with all the latest creative news, reviews, and features



More info...


ipad

The Complete Guide to the iPad

Packed with tips and tricks, the top 50 apps you must download & over 80 pages of step-by step tutorials.
Buy NOW for just £5.99, a saving of 40% off the retail price.

REVIEW: HP xw6600

Thursday 27 Mar 2008

  • platform PC
  • price £1,599
  • contact HP
  • pros Dual processor set-up; offers lots for the price.
  • cons 32-bit OS; mediocre performance.
  • rating 4

The xw6600 puts up to two Xeon processors in a slimline case. This is great if you’re short of space under or on top of your desk – but next to its rivals here (or, indeed, its xw8600 big brother), it’s a little short on storage.

The dull grey chassis packs a lot of components into a small space, with some inventive arrangement – for example, the RAM sits an angle behind its own fan. There are only two internal 3.5 inch drive bays, which are both taken in our test model, but we feel that HP could have got two more in if it hadn’t bothered to include an external 3.5-inch bay for a floppy drive that no-one uses.

Including two Xeon processors in a £1,600 workstation is a bit of bargain, especially when paired with 4GB of RAM and two hard drives. However, the xw6600’s performance in our tests isn’t up to its rivals with single chips and more RAM.

In pure rendering power, the xw6600’s Cinebench result was less than that of CAD2's Imagine DQX-Light, which uses the same chip – but much better than workstations with single chips, such as Armari's Magnetar QS2 or Xworks’ Best Buy-winning X8i-C2Q. The xw600’s real-time 3D score in Cinebench was mediocre too.

In Photoshop and After Effects though, the xw6600’s performance was mediocre next to these models. Both Armari’s and Xworks’ workstations were faster in After Effects – and only the Apple Mac Pro and Dell Precision T7400 were slower than the xw6600 in Photoshop.

A large part of this is due to HP installing Windows XP 32-bit on its workstation. This limits the available RAM to 3GB, so workstations access to more leave the xw6600 in their dust. However, even if HP had installed 64-bit Windows, it’s likely that applications such as After Effects would have still run slower than on models with 8GB RAM due to their heavy memory demands.

Another point against the xw6600 is that it produces more sound than its rivals.

This model was reviewed as part of our group test of workstations for graphics professionals.

Neil Bennett

Keep up-to-date with the latest creative hardware and software reviews -- click here follow @digital_arts on Twitter.


Submit to: DiggDigg deliciousDel.icio.us redditReddit

What is this?

xw6600 (DAO)

Click image for larger version


Promotions

alt content

Corbis Introduces £5 Web and Mobile Resolution Photos as New Research Finds Interesting Pictures Make Online Ads More Effective.

Click here for more information

Search reviews

Latest Reviews

Latest News

Latest Tutorials

Latest Features