Thursday 27 Mar 2008
- platform Windows XP 64-bit
- price £1,599 plus VAT
- company HP
- pros Dual processor set-up; offers lots for the price.
- cons 32-bit OS; mediocre performance.
- rating
The xw6600 puts up to two Xeon processors in a slimline case. This is great if you’re short of space under or on top of your desk – but next to its rivals here (or, indeed, its xw8600 big brother), it’s a little short on storage.
Question of the day!
Do you share your creations online?
% of Digital Arts readers agree with you
What do you create and how do you share it?
Follow the conversation at @TabletChat
paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm
I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo
Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo
The dull grey chassis packs a lot of components into a small space, with some inventive arrangement – for example, the RAM sits an angle behind its own fan. There are only two internal 3.5 inch drive bays, which are both taken in our test model, but we feel that HP could have got two more in if it hadn’t bothered to include an external 3.5-inch bay for a floppy drive that no-one uses.
Including two Xeon processors in a £1,600 workstation is a bit of bargain, especially when paired with 4GB of RAM and two hard drives. However, the xw6600’s performance in our tests isn’t up to its rivals with single chips and more RAM.
In pure rendering power, the xw6600’s Cinebench result was less than that of CAD2's Imagine DQX-Light, which uses the same chip – but much better than workstations with single chips, such as Armari's Magnetar QS2 or Xworks’ Best Buy-winning X8i-C2Q. The xw600’s real-time 3D score in Cinebench was mediocre too.
In Photoshop and After Effects though, the xw6600’s performance was mediocre next to these models. Both Armari’s and Xworks’ workstations were faster in After Effects – and only the Apple Mac Pro and Dell Precision T7400 were slower than the xw6600 in Photoshop.
A large part of this is due to HP installing Windows XP 32-bit on its workstation. This limits the available RAM to 3GB, so workstations access to more leave the xw6600 in their dust. However, even if HP had installed 64-bit Windows, it’s likely that applications such as After Effects would have still run slower than on models with 8GB RAM due to their heavy memory demands.
Another point against the xw6600 is that it produces more sound than its rivals.
This model was reviewed as part of our group test of workstations for graphics professionals.
Neil Bennett
Keep up-to-date with the latest creative hardware and software reviews -- click here follow @digital_arts on Twitter.
Submit to:
Click image for larger version
Question of the day!
Neil Bennett
Editor
Do you share your creations online?