NEW! Topic Zones

Storage World

NEW ADVENTURES IN DIGITAL PAINTING
REMIX YOUR ART
VINTAGE HALFTONES
COMIC ILLUSTRATION
SURREAL PORTRAITS
WATERCOLOUR VIDEO EFFECTS

PLUS - £300 OF STOCK IMAGES

The Complete Guide to the iPad

Packed with tips and tricks, the top 50 apps you must download & over 80 pages of step-by step tutorials.
Buy NOW for just £5.99, a saving of 40% off the retail price.

Gadget review: Samsung's Blu-ray player

Friday 23 Jun 2006 - 10:42

I had the opportunity to spend some quality time with Samsung's BD-P1000, the first Blu-ray Disc player for the living room, and was left with several early thoughts about this model as compared to Toshiba's HD-A1, its HD DVD player.

We'll post a full review of the Samsung BD-P1000 once we get a unit in-house, have titles from more than one studio, and have the chance to more fully test the unit in our lab. Here are my initial impressions of the player:

border=0 /><BR></div>
</p>

<p>
<b>Design</b>
</p>

<p>
The industrial design of the Samsung is far superior to that of the HD-A1 in several ways. The sleek, piano-black box has a tapered look; a circular, pressure-based front navigation panel; comfortable, lightweight remote control; and a 10-in-2 card slot reader for reading photos or MP3s. The player even resumes disc playback where you left off, whether you press stop, or you power the unit down -- a nice touch.
</p>

<p>
Inside, the player uses a proprietary Samsung processor and what the company describes as 64MB of system memory. It

Responsiveness

Again, the Samsung rates ahead here. Across a variety of standard definition and high definition films I threw at it, the Samsung was generally fast at navigating around and titles and menu options, and the remote's soft-mold buttons responded to my commands in a timely fashion. Sometimes, the Sony BD discs I tried (including House of Flying Daggers and 50 First Dates) were a bit sluggish when accessing chapters, but this problem did not seem evident with standard-def discs, which leads me to believe it's an issue with the discs, not the Samsung player.

Future-proofing

Toshiba's HD-A1 has the edge here. That player includes two USB ports up front, as well as an ethernet jack. Although Toshiba has not specified how those might be used down the road, at least the player has them (the inclusion of ethernet alone should make it easier down the road for consumers to upgrade the player). Samsung's player, on the other hand, has neither USB nor ethernet; any firmware upgrades will need to be handled via disc.

border=0 /><BR></div>
</p>

<p>
<b>Disc Playback</b>
</p>

<p>
The Samsung player was very responsive as I navigated around different aspects of the disc. I noticed that, upon rewinding within a scene, rather than precisely starting where I stopped the rewind, it instead did an auto-back track for a few frames, so I

Disc startup times -- from insertion to first picture -- seemed to vary from disc to disc, but all of the discs I tried were faster than the Toshiba player (when tested without the firmware update that Toshiba issued two weeks ago). Whereas the Toshiba player could require from a minute to up to 90 seconds to load a disc, the Samsung player was speedier: Memento required 32 seconds to load; House of Flying Daggers, 44 seconds; 50 First Dates, 31 seconds; The Fifth Element, 32 seconds; xXx, 32 seconds.

First Movie Titles and Disc Capacity

In a recent column, I observed how much disc space was utilized by eight HD DVD titles. Even though all eight titles relied on the latest video codecs--VC-1 and MPEG-4 AVC, both of which are more efficient encoders than MPEG-2 -- most of the titles showed signs of pushing HD DVD's capacity limits. The Last Samurai topped out at 27.3GB, Mel Brooks's Blazing Saddles at 25.4GB, The Phantom of the Opera at 24.8GB, Jarhead at 24.7GB, The Bourne Identity at 22.7GB, Serenity at 19.6GB, The Fugitive at 18.2GB, and Doom at 16.5GB. It seems that the first wave of Blu-ray titles are also pushing the space constraints of the format.

For now, these titles are limited to 25GB single-layer discs; 50GB dual-layer discs are forthcoming, though. Using Sony's new Vaio AR Premium, a notebook that includes a Blu-ray Disc burner, I checked out how much disc space Sony's first seven Blu-ray titles (encoded in MPEG-2, and many of them light on extra features) required. The results of this survey were quite telling: The Fifth Element needed 22.8GB; The Terminator, 23GB; House of Flying Daggers, 23.1GB; xXx, 22.3GB; Hitch, 22.9GB; Underworld: Evolution, 22.5GB; 50 First Dates, 18.8GB.

My one takeaway from this random survey of both Blu-ray and HD DVD titles: The physical disc format's capacity is going to be more integral to the future presentation of content than perhaps Hollywood, or even industry observers, originally anticipated.

Admittedly, with time the industry will develop better, more efficient video encoders that will produce equal video quality at lower bit rates--thereby requiring less space on a disc to do the same job. However, none of these early titles are tapping the full potential of extras filmed in high-definition, let alone the interactivity afforded by the authoring environments of either Blu-ray Disc (which uses its own flavor of Java), or HD DVD (which relies on Microsoft's iHD).

Picture Quality

Considering how many variables go into producing a movie title -- be it on DVD, HD DVD, or Blu-ray Disc -- I am not ready to judge the Samsung player, or the Blu-ray Disc format for that matter, on the first titles released by one studio. When we have a Samsung player in-house, I'll report on the results of my more thorough, comparative image quality testing.

Melissa Perenson

For more information see the Samsung Web site.

Keep up-to-date with the latest creative news -- click here follow @digital_arts on Twitter.